Testing Radar and Pressure Sensor Methods for Direct Streamflow Measurement and Prediction in Forested Watersheds: A Case Study in Brașov Area

Authors

  • V. Aga Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania
  • A. Mihalache National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Dracea”, Bucharest, Romania
  • M.D. Nita Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31926/but.fwiafe.2025.18.67.2.1

Keywords:

streamflow measurement, radar discharge sensor, pressure transducer, small catchment, mountain hydrology, flood monitoring

Abstract

Accurate measurement of streamflow in small mountain basins is critical for flood forecasting and water resource management, yet it remains challenging due to harsh conditions and lack of infrastructure. This study evaluates two modern direct discharge monitoring methods – a non-contact radar sensor and a submersible pressure transducer – in forested headwater catchments of the Carpathian Mountains in Romania. The radar device (Sommer RQ-30) and the pressure sensor (METER Hydros 21) were installed in comparable small basins to continuously record water level and discharge. We describe the measurement principles, field installations, and operational advantages and limitations of each system. Two representative flood events were analysed: a summer flash flood (peak discharge ~4.6 m³/s) monitored by the radar sensor in a 14 km² basin, and a spring snowmelt-driven flood (peak ~1.4 m³/s) captured by the pressure sensor in a 0.87 km² basin. The radar sensor provided real-time hydrographs with clearly defined peaks and minimal signal noise, while the pressure sensor (paired with a V-notch weir) yielded accurate discharge estimates but required data filtering and maintenance. Overall, the radar method performed better in capturing rapid flood dynamics and operational reliability in remote sites, whereas the pressure sensor method offered cost-effective accuracy for moderate flows and baseflow calibration. Key findings highlight the complementarity of these techniques for small mountain basins: the radar sensor ensures safety and continuity under extreme events, and the pressure sensor remains valuable for detailed low-flow measurements. The paper also discusses the comparative performance under field conditions and provides recommendations for integrating both technologies in monitoring networks.

Author Biographies

V. Aga, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania

Department of Forest Science, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Sirul Beethoven no. 1, Brasov 500123;
National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Dracea”, Bucharest, Romania
Eroilor Boulevard 128, Voluntari 077190

A. Mihalache, National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Dracea”, Bucharest, Romania

Eroilor Boulevard 128, Voluntari 077190

M.D. Nita, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania

Department of Forest Science, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Sirul Beethoven no. 1, Brasov 500123

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17

Issue

Section

FORESTRY