Ethical and Predatory Publishing: Experiences and Perceptions of Researchers

Authors

  • M.P. Yeoh SEAMEO RECSAM, Penang, Malaysia
  • A.M. Cazan Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania
  • S. Zaib University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan
  • W. Muss
  • L. Jacic Technical College Pozarevac, Serbia 

Keywords:

peer-review, predatory journals, academic publishing

Abstract

This study examines the experiences of how a sample of 30 researchers in Europe and Asia express their perceptions, describe their experiences, and navigate the challenges of predatory publishing. Most of the respondents commented on the lack of experience of researchers and also the desire for quick publishing as reasons why inexperienced researchers use predatory journals. Generally, respondents held negative views of predatory journals describing them as fake journals. Respondents indicated difficulties with ethical publishing despite doing rigorous research. We conclude that we should navigate our publishing so that we have the resources and ability to do an honest, rigorous research.

Author Biography

W. Muss

Retired from SALK-LKH and Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria

Downloads

Published

2018-01-31

Issue

Section

PSYCHOLOGY AND PEDAGOGY